|
What has happened to the ‘Heyday’ Challenge?
Heyday, which is an offshoot of Age Concern England, lodged a Judicial
Review challenging the UK Government’s interpretation of the original
EU Directive – particularly in respect to the introduction of the
National Default Retirement Age and the impact it has on the working opportunities
available to those close to state pension age.
The case came before the High Court in London in December 2006 but it
was immediately referred to the European Court of Justice. It seems unlikely
the case will be heard before Autumn 2008.
How many age discrimination claims have been filed
since the Regulations came into effect last year?
Fewer than many lawyers expected and many employers feared. According
to the Employment Tribunal Service, 972 cases were filed with Employment
Tribunals between October last year and June 2007.
Where can I get hold of further information and case
studies?
For further information and case studies contact TAEN - The Age and
Employment Network. (Tel: 020 7843 1590; e-mail: info@taen.org.uk) - or
one of the other members of the Age and Advice Network.
What is the history behind the Regulations?
In the lead up to the 1997 General Election, the new Labour party (which
was then in opposition) had said it would introduce legislation to combat
age discrimination. Once it was elected however, it bowed to pressure
from employers to adopt a voluntarist approach instead and introduced
a voluntary Code of Practice on Age Diversity as part of its Age Positive
campaign.
In 2000 the EU passed the Equal Treatment Directive 2000/78/EC which
established a general framework for equal treatment in employment and
occupation. The effect of the Directive was to introduce 3 new ‘strands’
of equality legislation (covering age, sexual orientation, religion or
belief) to join the 3 strands which already existed in the UK (gender,
ethnicity and disability).
Legislation transposing the Directive into the law of all EU member
states was supposed to be implemented by 1st December 2003. But in the
case of ‘age,’ the UK Government applied for a three year
delay (derogation) which was granted. So although the UK Regulations covering
SORB (sexual orientation, religion and belief) were introduced on 1st
December 2003, the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 came into
force on 1st October 2006.
How much does age discrimination cost the UK?
There are differing estimates on how much age discrimination in employment
costs the UK economy.
In 2000, the Government estimated the cost to be £16 billion a year
in lost GDP and £5 billion a year in welfare payments and lost taxes.
But the Employers Forum on Age (EFA) a couple of years later estimated
that the loss in terms of GDP was almost double (£31 billion) although
they agreed with the Government’s estimate of £5 billion in
welfare and lost taxes.
More recent estimates from other researchers have tended towards the
EFA’s figure.
Why do the UK’s Age Discrimination Regulations
cover younger workers as well?
Firstly, because younger workers also encounter age discrimination.
(Indeed, younger workers perceive they encounter age discrimination to
a greater extent than do older workers). Whilst older job applicants are
often told they are ‘over qualified’ for the job, younger
applicants and workers are often wrongly denied opportunities on the basis
that they are too young and/or don’t have enough experience.
Secondly, because the EU Directive, on which the UK’s Regulations
are based, covers younger as well as older workers.
The decisions to maintain age based criteria for the National Minimum
Wage and for Statutory Redundancy Pay both directly discriminate against
younger workers but are permitted under the ‘public policy’
exemption in the Directive according to the Government.
What is the ‘public policy’ exemption?
Under Article 6. 1a of the EU Equal Treatment Directive 2000 :-
“…Member States may provide that differences of treatment
on the grounds of age shall not constitute discrimination, if, within
the context of national law, they are objectively and reasonably justified
by a legitimate aim, including legitimate employment policy…, and
if the means of achieving the aim are appropriate and necessary.”
As mentioned above, the Government is using this article to justify the
exemptions it has made in respect of the National Minimum Wage, Statutory
Redundancy Pay, the various New Deals, the exemptions around occupational
pension schemes, etc…. but also for the introduction of the new
National Default Retirement Age of 65.
Who is, and isn’t covered by the Regulations?
The Regulations cover anyone old enough to legally undertake paid employment
- with no upper age limit. They apply to direct employees; self-employed
and contract workers; temporary, fixed term and agency workers; Office
Holders; Partners; job applicants and people undertaking or applying for
work-related training.
Unpaid volunteers and members of the armed forces are not covered.
Why do older jobseekers find it difficult to get jobs?
The National Audit Office in its Welfare to Work: Tackling the Barriers
to Older Workers report published in September 2004 listed the following
age-related barriers :-
Employer attitudes based on myths & stereotypes
Health conditions or Disability
Lack of qualifications / Work Experience
Low basic skills
Jobseeker attitudes / Lack of confidence
Caring responsibilities
Financial
How many people want to work beyond state pension age?
And how many people are currently doing so?
The number of people who want the opportunity to go on working up to,
and beyond, state pension age (SPA) is steadily increasing - as are the
numbers who are actually doing so.
According to a recent survey* 6 out of 10 adults aged 50-69 want to work
on past state pension age. And there are currently more than 1.2 million
people over SPA who are in paid employment (an increase of % (over xxx)
in the past 12 months). Two thirds of those working beyond SPA are women.
* Conducted with 1,800 50-69 year olds in the Spring of 2006 on behalf
of Heyday/Age Concern
If the Government wants everyone to work longer why
has it brought in the National Default Retirement Age?
The Government got cold feet about scrapping fixed retirement ages after
it had come under sustained pressure from a number of employers’
organisations (including the CBI, EEF and British Chambers of Commerce)
not to do so. These organisations claimed that fixed retirement ages were
essential for workforce planning purposes even though research shows that
the majority of employees ‘retire’ (or are retired) before
they reach those ages.
Introducing the National Default Retirement Age of 65 was seen as a pragmatic
compromise and the Government is committed to reviewing it in 2011. The
working assumption of most of employers’ groups is that the decision
to scrap it will be taken then, although it may be several more years
after that before it happens.
Why do the Regulations only apply to employment and
training?
Firstly, because the EU Directive only applies to employment and training.
Secondly because the Government also made the decision the Regulations
should not cover ‘goods, facilities and services’ as well.
However, there is currently a consultation taking place following the
publication of the Discrimination Law Review’s Green Paper that
is seeking views on such an extension.
Do public sector employers have a duty to promote age
diversity?
No, not under the present Age Regulations. The present consultation
following the publication of Discrimination Law Review’s Green Paper
is seeking views on whether such a duty for age should be included in
a future Single Equality Bill. Although the Government made a manifesto
commitment to bring forward such a Bill in this Parliament, it seems unlikely
to happen until 2009 at the earliest.
Which Equality Commission will oversee the Age Regulations?
The new Commission on Equality and Human Rights (CEHR) will be responsible
when it comes into being in October 2007.
|